‘West Indies should go out of the field’, ‘How are Wi players not protesting?’ Cricket news
West Indies cricket coach Daren Sammy expressed concern over the decision of the TV umpire Edrian Holdstock during the inaugural test against Australia in Barbados, after several controversial reviews on the second day of the game. Sammy on Thursday met the match referee Javagal Srinath to discuss his concerns, which stems from Holdstock’s previous term in the ODI series in England.Two important decisions specifically harassed the West Indies team. The LBW of Captain Roston Chase earlier dismissed Pat Cummins bowling, yet what the team believed to be shown to be the proof of an inner side. The second worried Shai Hope’s Bu Webster was rejected, where Alex Kerry’s catch was cleaned after reviewing.Go beyond the border with our YouTube channel. Subscribe now!Sammy said, “We are just trying to find some kind of understanding what the process is.” “We hope only for continuity. We can ask all this. When there is doubt in something, just correspond to the board.”“I have seen, especially with this special umpire, this is something that started in England. It is disappointing. I just ask for continuity in decision making.”Sammy especially addressed her concerns about the crime of Holdstock. “Yes, see, you don’t want to bring yourself into a situation where you are thinking about some umpires. Is there anything against this team? But when you see the decision after the decision, it raises the question. I know that he is here for the series. You don’t want to go to a Test match with that doubt.”“So I want to do that conversation as this process … so we can all be clear. Because, at the end of the day, you do not want to go to a Test match that do not trust the umpires. And it is not what our team is. So we are just looking for some clarity as decisions. ,When questioned about filing a formal complaint, Sammy said, “You have to wait and look for it.”
An X user in the West Indies vs Australia First Test.
Regarding the dismissal of Chase, which took place with Hope during a significant 67-ran sixth-wicket partnership, Sammy said, “In our opinion, we saw the ball distracted on the pad.”Sammy compared Hope’s dismissal from the previous day and the Reprus of Travis Head. “I am just saying, what judge you see,” Sammy said. “If you see the same thing and not out, then there is even more doubt on the other given by you. Again, I don’t know what he has seen, but the images we have seen are not enough for both teams. We are for all humans. Mistakes will be made. I just want fairness.,Australia also experienced a controversial decision when the morning LBW appeal was denied against Chase. Mitchell Starc questioned the synchronization between images and audio in the replay.“Some interesting,” Stark said. “Obviously a couple have gone against us against the West Indies. One for us [against Chase] It seemed that there was an interval between the bat and the ball, it spends us 40-year-old runs, but then there is a controversial who gets wickets then. ,“As players, you can ask only one question. We do not use the technique to make that decision. It was felt, or it seemed that snico and images were out of the sink for some capacity.”
An X user in the West Indies vs Australia First Test.
An X user in the West Indies vs Australia First Test.
Stark mentioned that the Australian team believed that the head lead should have been denied to expect the previous day.Sammy accepted the risks of commenting on match officials and discouraged his players to discuss decisions. “We know the rules. We know the fine going across the board,” he said. “I don’t want them to focus on it. Yes, we leave so many catches and shoot ourselves in the feet, but watch the Test match, [us] Our own decisions, some of these decisions, and we are still in a position to win.,
