‘ICC needs to see umpiring’: Paul Refel focused in the focus after ‘anti -‘ bias; Tell the facts different story. Cricket news
India’s cricketers R Ashwin and Anil Kumble have expressed concern over the decision of umpire Paul Refel during the Lord’s Test between England and India, which suggests possible bias in their decisions against India.During the fourth day game, many controversial decisions gave rise to warm discussions. In a remarkable incident, Joe Root was not being given by Refel for a Mohammad Siraj delivery, shown, shown that the leg stump was clipped. Another controversial moment occurred when Indian captain Shubman Gill was caught behind Bridan Cars, one decision later overturned at the review.Go beyond the border with our YouTube channel. Subscribe now!“My experience with Paul Refel … You need to talk to him. You need to install it. I am not saying that you are asking him to give it. But he has it … Whenever India bowls, he feels that it does not exit, whenever it is batting, he feels that it is not only against India, but it is against every team, but you can see the Ashwin,” “Ashwin said.
Referring to Gill’s decision, Ashwin remarked: “Look at it. I have a sedan. It can pass through the gap between the bat and the ball here. When I first saw it, I thought it was not out.”Ashwin explained on his concerns about Refel’s decision -making pattern: “But this was not the first time (a wrong decision was given). My father was watching the match with me and he was saying, ‘If Paul Refel is there, we will not win.’ Whenever Paul reefel umpiring, the decisions go against India. When we are bowling, the umpire’s call is usually not out. When we are batting, there is no umpire call (in our favor). There is something there. My father says that whenever he umpiring, India loses. ,Anil Kumble shared his view on umpiring after one of the delivery of Siraj after trapping the route in front of the stump. On reviewing, the ball was shown hitting stumps, but the umpire’s call rule came into force.“It seems that Paul Refel has decided that it is not going to be out. Nothing closer, not out, “the legendary leg-spinner said.Fact Czech: Does Paul Refel have anti -India bias?
The match was reviewing 11 decisions when the former Australia’s former seamar reefel was an umpire.With England’s batting, India took two reviews, one was overturned, while the other was on the call of the umpire. During India’s turn to bat, India’s review was overturned, while England did not remain out while chasing England’s wicket.During the second innings of the test, India performed three reviews with three reviews, which included a single as an umpire call. Only one decision came out in India’s favor. As India chased the victory, they managed to turn one of the two reviews. Meanwhile, England faced frustration of umpire’s call, which was not on out calls.
Overall, 11 dismissal that was put into the on-field umpire Refel and later reviewed, seven came in favor of India. England can celebrate only four times after a review.The statistical analysis of Refel’s umpiring records in matches associated with India presents a separate picture. In 39 international matches where refail has worked, India has won 23 matches, maintaining a win percentage of 58.97%.DRS figures suggest that out of the decision of 21 “umpire calls” in reviews against refail decisions, 11 have favor India, representing 52.38% of such calls. Especially in Test matches, 14 of the 21 successful reviews against Refel’s decisions have been in India’s favor.
